Perugia, 1 March
''The pipeline network and the Adriatic 'work by the great environmental impact in areas at risk of fragility' geological and seismic activity. The track so 'as developed by Snam, would produce irreparable damage to the landscape and economy of the countries affected by the work. Thus, we ask that the Regional Council should follow the example of the Province of Perugia and the city of Gubbio, and now present the application to the Commission European Union so that 'all appropriate regulations are complied with in the design of a work of great importance.'' With these words Dottorini Oliviero, leader of Italy of Values \u200b\u200bin the Regional Council of Umbria, and Paul Ugly, regional director and secretary, announced that they have sent to all groups of the majority text of a motion to reconsider the route of the pipeline Brindisi Minehead-and simultaneously support the appeal to the European Commission to assess whether all the appropriate technical procedures have been complied with. Kilometers of the eighteenth century'', in large part on the crest of fine ridges, crossing numerous streams, protected natural areas, sites of Community Importance and Special Protection Areas. More specifically - add - in the region will be affected drawn from the National Park of Monti Sibillini, the forests of the basin of Gubbio, the river and the woods of Sand Martin Pietralunga. It is not clear why the environmental impact assessment has been carried out only on some parts of the route without taking into account the whole work that must be remembered, will cross' most of Italy along the Apennine ridge, an area of \u200b\u200bseismic risk and hydro. We believe it is' appropriate for the Regional Council is an active part in this affair, and Snam to ask the government to revise a path that has many problematic aspects.'' Reading the cards''of the project - and continue Dottorini Ugly - is seen as the socio-economic impact on affected areas would be unsustainable and risk di provocare danni alla filiera turismo-ambiente-cultura e al settore delle eccellenze, dai prodotti tipici alle importanti aree tartufigene dell'Umbria. Chiediamo dunque che la Regione, rompendo una tradizione consolidata, si schieri dalla parte dei cittadini, delle associazioni ambientaliste e dei comitati non per escludere a priori il passaggio della linea di metanodotto, ma per giungere alla scelta di un tracciato razionale e per vigilare affinche' tutte le procedure autorizzative di un'opera talmente invasiva siano rispettate e che vengano realizzate le valutazioni di impatto ambientale, coinvolgendo le comunita' locali interessate per scegliere i tracciati meno impattanti e piu' sicuri, nel rispetto dell'ambiente e degli interessi della comunita' Regional.''
0 comments:
Post a Comment